battles: ?

Is it just me, or is Battles a little overrated? It seems like any emerging band that plays weird time signatures, experiments with effects, and uses atypical song structures, is all of the sudden God’s latest gift to the music scene. Mozart reincarnated, or something like that.

I don’t get it. It just seems like a bit of a rehash to me. What happened to the songs man? It used to be about the songs!

tags: ,

4 responses to “battles: ?”

  1. Dan says:

    I didn’t know that anyone rated this stuff in the first place.

  2. Benjamin Allison says:

    No, no one’s literally rating anything (well, besides Pitchfork — which means quite a great deal to a lot of people). They’ve just become Indie/prog/post rock poster boys and I feel it’s unwarranted.

  3. Dan says:

    I would pick Holy Fuck over them.

  4. Dan says:

    Pitchfork? Pssh, the cool kids read Stereogum now.

leave a reply